Alfa Romeo Giulietta (Topic Ufficiale - 2009)

[owluca]

120d con 205/55 R16

120d con 205/55 R16

grazie, ma ehmm

delle 2 l'una:

o hai messo 2 volte la stessa tabella

oppure stai dicendo che vanno proprio uguale-uguale uguale

[V6 Busso]

Se volete c'è anche il pratico è (imho) preferibile TomTom da innestare in plancia... Io la predisposizione la prenderei, mentre il navi a scomparsa no...*

Se è come quelli Fiat non è solo questione di innesto: è collegato all'odometro in modo da non interrompersi nelle gallerie, ha l'alimentazione senza bisogno di cavetti attaccati alla presa dell'accendisigari ecc

Dev'essere lo stesso che monta (optional) la Punto Evo. Scelta molto intelligente: integrazione ottima e solida (e senza cavetti da collegare), relativamente economica (in confronto al navigatore integrato) e possibilità di scaricare gli aggiornamenti via web da casa.

[max_pershin]

Strano,più o meno il valore della Bravo. Valore maggiore di circa il 5- 10%.

Bravo - 21250 nm/degree

Panda 12298

Lybra SW 12993

Palio 13607

Strada 14025

Idea 14339

Grande Punto 5p 16241

147 5p 16241

Sportwagon 16747

Lybra 17096

Stilo 17444

GT more than 17444

Croma 17549

MiTo 17654

156 18805

147 3p 18805

Multipla 18840

Grande Punto 3p 19712

Bravo 21247

Fiorino 23201

Giulietta 23250

Ducato 23341

159 Sportwagon 23550

166 24422

Thesis 2001 25731

Kappa Coupe 27353

Thesis 2002 29661

Nuovo Ducato (medium roof and medium wheel base) 30475

159 31400

Modificato 13 Aprile 2010 da max_pershin

[V6 Busso]

Per farmi perdonare vi ho fatto una tabella con le velocità per ogni marcia a tutti i regimi del 2.0 170cv a nafta con i cerchi da 16'. Se avete altre richieste con altri cerchi e motorizzazioni dite pure.

120d con 205/55 R16

Apprezzabile lo sforzo , ma le 2 tabelle sono identiche. E in V e in VI le 2 auto non arrivano a 4000 giri, men che meno a 5000: magari facessero 272 km/h...

[Raxiel]

su EVO la QV prende mezza stella meno del 1.4 170cv

What is it?

Here is the top model in the new Alfa Giulietta range, the 232bhp Quadrofoglio Verde or Green Cloverleaf. It outpowers a Golf GTI, doesn't quite match a Mégane 250 and has an engine smaller than both. If you were hoping for a replacement for the the old 3.2-litre, V6-engined 147 GTA, you'll be disappointed – but downsizing is the way of the world now.

Technical highlights

The engine is the 1.8-litre, direct-injection turbo unit already seen in the 159 and Brera, which uses extremely variable valve timing to scavenge combustion chambers for great low-speed torque and minimal turbo lag. The new 'Compact' platform shares only the floor sections with the 147, and the new suspension uses much aluminium. The platform can take four-wheel drive so expect a future 'Compact'-based SUV.

What’s it like to drive?

Stung by criticism of the smaller Mito's stodgy, rubbery electric power steering, the Giulietta has a new system with the motor on the rack instead of the column - less friction; less inertia. The result is a much more natural steering feel and a welcome transparency. The standard-fit Q2 system functions as an electronic differential to brake the inside front wheel when understeer threatens, and it works well. VDC (Alfa's ESP) intervenes readily in the DNA system's Normal mode, but not too annoyingly. The throttle response is pretty dull, though.

Switch to Dynamic and it's a much better Giulietta. The throttle sharpens so you can enjoy the hefty low-end torque better and hear that deep, crisp engine note. The steering weight rises but in a natural way, not by artificially increasing resistance. And the brakes change from spongy to quite sharp, thanks to 'pre-fill'. Dynamic also loosens the tail a little before VDC intervenes, but this is still not a car to be pointed keenly into a bend on a trailing throttle and caught with a dab of power. It's too tied-down and inert for that, which is a shame for an Alfa Romeo.

This is more a GT than a proper hot hatchback, an impression heightened by the engine's inability to pass 6250rpm, and a trick has been missed. It does ride well, though, even on its shallow-sidewall 225/40 R18 tyres.

How does it compare?

The Giulietta's chassis engineers rate the Audi A3 highly and think a Ford Focus poor, which tells you a lot. The QV should be a rival for that Golf GTI and Mégane 250 but it lacks their dynamic sparkle. Instead it's good A3 or BMW 1-series alternative, which is what Alfa Romeo wanted. As far as the mainland European market is concerned, Alfa is probably right.

Anything else I need to know?

Expect a price around £22,000, but you might be better off saving a little and going for the 168bhp 1.4 MultiAir, driven here. Why? Because it's lighter in the nose, keener to turn, more playful on the throttle and ultimately more fun.

Modificato 13 Aprile 2010 da Raxiel

[francesco147]

oh rax.....ma che rosso è?:mrgreen: scherzo dai comunque che spettacolo in queste foto.

[Raxiel]

oh rax.....ma che rosso è?:mrgreen: scherzo dai comunque che spettacolo in queste foto.

Mah ci ho rinunciato. Penso il Competizione comunque:§

[Meg85...]

su EVO la QV prende mezza stella meno del 1.4 170cv

What is it?

Here is the top model in the new Alfa Giulietta range, the 232bhp Quadrofoglio Verde or Green Cloverleaf. It outpowers a Golf GTI, doesn't quite match a Mégane 250 and has an engine smaller than both. If you were hoping for a replacement for the the old 3.2-litre, V6-engined 147 GTA, you'll be disappointed – but downsizing is the way of the world now.

Technical highlights

The engine is the 1.8-litre, direct-injection turbo unit already seen in the 159 and Brera, which uses extremely variable valve timing to scavenge combustion chambers for great low-speed torque and minimal turbo lag. The new 'Compact' platform shares only the floor sections with the 147, and the new suspension uses much aluminium. The platform can take four-wheel drive so expect a future 'Compact'-based SUV.

What’s it like to drive?

Stung by criticism of the smaller Mito's stodgy, rubbery electric power steering, the Giulietta has a new system with the motor on the rack instead of the column - less friction; less inertia. The result is a much more natural steering feel and a welcome transparency. The standard-fit Q2 system functions as an electronic differential to brake the inside front wheel when understeer threatens, and it works well. VDC (Alfa's ESP) intervenes readily in the DNA system's Normal mode, but not too annoyingly. The throttle response is pretty dull, though.

Switch to Dynamic and it's a much better Giulietta. The throttle sharpens so you can enjoy the hefty low-end torque better and hear that deep, crisp engine note. The steering weight rises but in a natural way, not by artificially increasing resistance. And the brakes change from spongy to quite sharp, thanks to 'pre-fill'. Dynamic also loosens the tail a little before VDC intervenes, but this is still not a car to be pointed keenly into a bend on a trailing throttle and caught with a dab of power. It's too tied-down and inert for that, which is a shame for an Alfa Romeo.

This is more a GT than a proper hot hatchback, an impression heightened by the engine's inability to pass 6250rpm, and a trick has been missed. It does ride well, though, even on its shallow-sidewall 225/40 R18 tyres.

How does it compare?

The Giulietta's chassis engineers rate the Audi A3 highly and think a Ford Focus poor, which tells you a lot. The QV should be a rival for that Golf GTI and Mégane 250 but it lacks their dynamic sparkle. Instead it's good A3 or BMW 1-series alternative, which is what Alfa Romeo wanted. As far as the mainland European market is concerned, Alfa is probably right.

Anything else I need to know?

Expect a price around £22,000, but you might be better off saving a little and going for the 168bhp 1.4 MultiAir, driven here. Why? Because it's lighter in the nose, keener to turn, more playful on the throttle and ultimately more fun.

bah...sono perplesso...onestamente credo che la Qv sia abbastanza divertente come motorizzazione... il problema è che, forse, avrebbero dovuto caratterizzarla un po' di più...se prendo una GTi, ho anche sedili specifici, volante specifico etc etc...avessero messo le sdc, un volantino apposito e apposite modanature, avrebbero ottenuto tutt'altro risultato, sia internamente che alla prova pratica...così pare tanto una motorizzazione come le altre, non un allestimento specifico...non basta il badge sul passaruota...

[francesco147]

Mah ci ho rinunciato. Penso il Competizione comunque:§

si lo penso anche io.....

[Raxiel]

bah...sono perplesso...onestamente credo che la Qv sia abbastanza divertente come motorizzazione... il problema è che, forse, avrebbero dovuto caratterizzarla un po' di più...se prendo una GTi, ho anche sedili specifici, volante specifico etc etc...avessero messo le sdc, un volantino apposito e apposite modanature, avrebbero ottenuto tutt'altro risultato, sia internamente che alla prova pratica...così pare tanto una motorizzazione come le altre, non un allestimento specifico...non basta il badge sul passaruota...

Si credo anche io, anche se il motore dovrebbe essere notevole.

Comunque il fatto che dicono che il 1.4 in proporzione alla spesa è piu divertente, leggere e vivace mi fà piacere. Visto che è la motorizzazione che ho scelto