[USA] Dodge Dart 2013

[kat]

BEST OF EUROPEAN ENGINEERING

Non so se è apprezzato

[arrigo]

prezzo base 15.995

[Stefano73]

prezzo base 15.995

[LucioFire]

Molto interessante l'aspirato m-air 2 2.4 a 184 CV, che è spendibile/vendibile in tutto il mondo, ( molto più del 1.4 turbo )

[stev66]

Come potenza non è nulla di esaltante...il 2.2 di derivazione gm che montava 159 aveva 185 cv...ed era più piccolo di cilindrata.Magari va bene così

[alfa75qv88]

imho dovrebbe costare un po' meno del freemont, altrimenti non avrebbe speranze nella lotta interna contro il crossover Dodge/Fiat

[JackSEWing]

Credano quello che gli pare, basta che poi la comprino

Se pensi che qua in EU c'e' gente convinta che Golf VI sia un'auto nuova rispetto alla V, o che Giulietta sia una Bravo coi fari diversi, non so chi si salvi!

Ehehehehe

io invece sto leggendo commenti molto positivi sulla tecnologia italiana, come questo (pag 11 utente RVC)

Posted December 9, 2011 at 09:53 am

Well, I think it simply boils down to assessing who is in the best position to do the job and assigning that part of the company the job in a very pragmatic and rational way.

FIAT has historically been strong in A and B segment cars, which is also the segment that makes up the bulk of cars sold in Europe. But, like most every other brand in Europe, they have had difficulties breaking into the mass European C segment against the VW Golf (the Giulietta is successful, but it's not a mass car, it's more of an A3, 1-series specialty type car). Large cars have been limited to luxury Maseratis, ever since the mid 80s.

By contrast, Chrysler has been historically more present in the US D, E, J segments, which in the US represent the bulk of the market. Considering that realistically D and C segments can (and in all probability will) be based off the same platform, it is logical that work would be shared this way.

I don't think it is necessarily a matter of giving up on FIATs ability to design anything larger than A-B, especially if you consider that the platform that underpins the Giulietta(which has been recognized as one of the best if not the best in its class) will be the basis for most of this next generation of dodges, chryslers and even jeeps.

e per finire :lol:

It's simply a matter of economics and just letting each side of the company play to its strengths like true partners, which is a welcome change from the sort of disrespectful, disruptive, egomaniac attitude that ze previous parent kompany shoved down Chryslers throat :lol:

[Dannatio]

io invece sto leggendo commenti molto positivi sulla tecnologia italiana, come questo (pag 11 utente RVC)

Posted December 9, 2011 at 09:53 am

Well, I think it simply boils down to assessing who is in the best position to do the job and assigning that part of the company the job in a very pragmatic and rational way.

FIAT has historically been strong in A and B segment cars, which is also the segment that makes up the bulk of cars sold in Europe. But, like most every other brand in Europe, they have had difficulties breaking into the mass European C segment against the VW Golf (the Giulietta is successful, but it's not a mass car, it's more of an A3, 1-series specialty type car). Large cars have been limited to luxury Maseratis, ever since the mid 80s.

By contrast, Chrysler has been historically more present in the US D, E, J segments, which in the US represent the bulk of the market. Considering that realistically D and C segments can (and in all probability will) be based off the same platform, it is logical that work would be shared this way.

I don't think it is necessarily a matter of giving up on FIATs ability to design anything larger than A-B, especially if you consider that the platform that underpins the Giulietta(which has been recognized as one of the best if not the best in its class) will be the basis for most of this next generation of dodges, chryslers and even jeeps.

e per finire :lol:

It's simply a matter of economics and just letting each side of the company play to its strengths like true partners, which is a welcome change from the sort of disrespectful, disruptive, egomaniac attitude that ze previous parent kompany shoved down Chryslers throat :lol:

Dalle parti di Stoccarda starà fischiando più di qualche orecchio.....:lol:

[Touareg 2.5]

Aggiunte le High Res ufficiali nel primo messaggio !

[LucioFire]

aveva anche un paio di omologazioni anti-inquinamento in meno...

Nota anche il 2.4 Honda di CRV USA ha 185 CV....e ben 220 Nm di coppia max ( come un 1.6 Turbo nostrano )

Se questo motorino conferma i numeri nipponici è un bel frullino.