Vai al contenuto

Bare

Utente Registrato
 Visualizza profilo  Vedi la sua attività

  • Numero contenuti pubblicati

    2360

  • Iscritto il

  • Ultima visita

  • Giorni Massima Popolarità

    6

 Tipo di contenuto 

Tutti i contenuti di Bare

  1. Bare
    C'mon, they even didn't do such an easy work as Uconnect for CMP or turbo Firefly for CMP (not even for Brazil). For me that's very lazy on development side. Or at least stingy. Not to mention that dimensions of CMP cars are almost the same. There is no different wheelbase, car height, etc. You have B SUV and all are the same. I mean, Jeep Avenger has a height of a tall hatchback.
  2. Bare
    secondo me Gilles > Ploue
  3. Bare
    Thank You mister Tavaresh!
  4. Bare
    This is not a classic DCT. Unfortunately I can't find the article which I've posted on this forum a long time ago. I think that I've posted it. This is not a classic DCT. We can talk about single clutch transmission with additional e-clutch. The wet-clutch, six-speed DCA is different from a conventional dual-clutch transmission (DCT) by the virtue of its separately-placed clutches, as well as a single layshaft unlike the DCT‘s two or three units. The patented new way of realising the dual clutch principle offers seamless DCT shifting, while using 35 percent less shifting components. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.autocarpro.in/news-national/punch-powertrains-compact-dct-system-debuts-with-tata-altroz-81412%3famp=1 Vitesco iz German company based in Regensburg.
  5. Bare
    This is not classic DCT. Actually this is a single clutch transmissio. And that's all folks Usual PSA way of doing things. Cheap as possible Not very advanced Performance is not imortant Engineering is outsourced Production is done by PSA
  6. Bare
    This transmission doesn't have 2 clutches although the name may suggest otherwise.
  7. Bare
    What's so good with this new 1.2 PureTech. From that I've seen based on aperformance level it can't hold a candle for 1.5 FireFly. It's sad to see abandonment of a superior engine.
  8. Bare
    2 is market segment? So they are a bit of inconsistent or not? STLA Medium based Lancia D segment product has number 4 while for exaplme next gen Giulia and Stelvio on STLA Large have number 5... Can you list all body codes/project under the new nomenclature in appropriate thread. All in the one place
  9. Bare
  10. Bare
    There is no 136 HP version?
  11. Bare
    Lancia versions had hemispherical combustion chamber?
  12. Bare
    PSA mechanics?
  13. Bare
    Color range is disgusting.
  14. Bare
    I must once again said that Stellantis did a lazy job with so called CMP 2. Anyway, what does '2' in the name means? They did not redo platform for FCA infotainment system. They did not made it suitable for FCA engines. I know that PSA want it cheap and sources in house. But was it so hard to make this car suitable for 1.5 MHEV engine? Engine which is ready au contraire to 1.2 MHEV solution from PSA which also has dubious choice of transmission. It's not double clutch even if they call it that way. And one simple thing. They did all of this products with shortest available wheelbase length. Why?
  15. Bare
    Also Avenger has dad lesser measured cargo space than 500X. It's the worst in the class. CMP has many drawbacks, many tehcnical drawbacks. The only advantage is price.
  16. Bare
    I'm wondering if anything on PSA mechanics can replace FCA products. 😂 I mean, so poorly engineered, cost cuts at every step and so on. BTW. There is none 4 cylinder GSE on CMP based products, not even in Brazil. It just doesn't fit. I presume it's due to position of ancillaries.
  17. Bare
    What does? Big nothing!?
  18. Bare
    Airflow was back at the drawing board due to regulation changes related to subsidize for BEV cars and SUVs. It's related to a ground clearance. Original Airflow has low ground clearance and thus was legally a car and not an SUV.
  19. Bare
    Most likely Wrangler will keep its unique platform/frame
  20. Bare
    @__P Wrangler on STLA Frame? Are you sure?
  21. Bare
    Looking at how is all going with BEV demand and having a multienergy platform with STLA Large ex PSA management would be mad if they're going to offer BEV only models in the future. But to me ex PSA leadership so far look stingy and devoid of reality.
  22. Bare
    That's not stellantis' nomenclature. It's 100% PSA.
  23. Bare
    https://it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barra_Panhard
  24. Bare
    For me here is the prime example of a clear push of expensive French products. France is first!
  25. Bare
    They did a lazy job with ex-FCA'a CMP based triplets. They even didn't bother to implement FireFly engines and UConnect to it. They even have no shame calling 1.2 PuteDreck a GSE and an infotainment a UConnect.
×
×
  • Crea Nuovo...

 

Stiamo sperimentando dei banner pubblicitari a minima invasività: fai una prova e poi facci sapere come va!

Per accedere al forum, disabilita l'AdBlock per questo sito e poi clicca su accetta: ci sarai di grande aiuto! Grazie!

Se non sai come si fa, puoi pensarci più avanti, cliccando su "ci penso" per continuare temporaneamente a navigare. Periodicamente ricomparità questo avviso come promemoria.

Accetto!
Ci penso...